ITEM # | Request Description | Response |
1 | Requirements for Assured Water Supply | 
|
2 | Regulatory constraints (state, local, federal) | 
|
3 | Legislative and statutory impediments? | 
|
4 | CAGRD Plan of Operation | 
|
5 | Arizona Department of Water Resources | 
|
6 | Project Wheel |
|
7 | Statewide Water Advisory Group |
|
8 | Governor's Water Management Commission Final Report | 
|
9 | Disposition of 100KAF of Drop 2 water | 
|
10 | Timeline for completion of a wheeling contract with the US | 
|
11 | CAP Subcontracting Status Report | 
|
12 | Explain how CAP Canal was paid for; how CAP water was allocated; CAP rates set | 
|
13 | Who gets excess water? | 
|
14 | Inventory of subcontract volumes, Indian leases and other project supplies by water provider (including future ASLD allocations). | 
|
15 | Commitment made under existing CAP subcontracts and contracts (M&I and Indian) as far as deliveries in a particular month | |
16 | Amount each CAP subcontractor has contributed to repayment costs of the Project through capital charges. | 
|
17 | Net assessed valuation within each CAP subcontractor's service area | 
|
18 | The incremental costs of delivering water through the CAP to each segment of the system (divided into segments by pumping plant locations) | 
|
19 | Current CAP bonding capacity that could potentially be available for ADD water | 
|
20 | Accounting of total project costs broken down by re-imbursable and non-re-imbursable costs. | 
|
21 | Capital charge revenues to date paid by water providers. | 
|
22 | Ad valorem taxes collected to date aggregated by water provider geographies. | 
|
23 | Revenues received from sources other than water providers by category (e.g. power and interest). | 
|
24 | Quantification of postage stamp rate benefit by water provider. | 
|
25 | What ESA and NEPA compliance for mainstream Colorado River water transfers has the MSCP already addressed? What are the costs? What has already been paid and by whom? | 
|
26 | Projected capital charge revenues paid by water providers between now and 2030. | 
|
27 | Projected ad valorem taxes to be collected between now and 2030 aggregated by water provider geographies. | 
|
28 | For water provider geographies, compare costs paid and expected to be paid to benefits received and expected to be received (including benefits of postage stamp rate). | 
|
29 | Analysis of CAP's statutory authority to purchase non-project water rights for M&I and CAGRD purposes. | 
|
30 | What authority does CAWCD have to undertake ADD? What are statutory constraints? Statutory opportunities | 
|
31 | What are the components of cost | 
|
32 | Pay up front or as you use it | 
|
33 | Ensure ACC is part of the process | 
|
34 | Water to meet CAGRD obligations | 
|
35 | Water to meet water demands in most water deficit areas. | 
|
36 | Water delivered to points of use | 
|
37 | User entity or supply entity determines amount of need? | 
|
38 | ACC needs to allow cost recovery in the rate base | 
|
39 | For benefit of 3 county area ground water needs to be replaced with renewable supplies for long term economic success and quality of life | 
|
40 | Need vs. want (who/what determines) | 
|
41 | Can we get it earlier and recharge it? | 
|
42 | What will the ADD Water cost? | 
|
43 | Can we afford it? | 
|
44 | How the value of items 43 & 44 will be carried forward under the ADD water cost sharing so that the subcontractors receive the value of their existing investment in the Project | 
|
45 | Mechanisms in place to collect revenue from potential ADD water customers that have not contributed to repayment of the CAP | 
|
46 | Opportunities to create phases of ADD water (early participants not pay same as subsequent participants) | 
|
47 | Opportunities to create different categories of ADD water supply needs (dry year options vs. long term AWS-eligible supplies, etc.) | 
|
48 | What water quality standards that are/will be established to move non-Project water in the canal? | 
|
49 | Can customers purchase ADD water for direct recharge or in lieu recharge? | 
|
50 | Can customers purchase ADD water for exchange purposes (e.g., exchange for effluent)? | 
|
51 | Will profit on sale of water be allowed? | 
|
52 | How are projections of need determined? | 
|
53 | How will this cost associated with MSCP be recovered from ADD water participants who have not contributed previously? | 
|
54 | AMWUA Sustainability Policies | 
|
55 | AMWUA Sustainability Process | 
|
56 | Research into how water supplies are shared and paid for in other states and countries. This research is needed before the criteria session. | 
|
57 | What criteria are used by other wholesale water providers in other states and countries? | 
|
58 | Review of successful programs to share additional water supplies and their related costs (national and international) | 
|
59 | Canvassing of other models that exist across country or internationally such as: MWD, San Diego Co. Water Authority, SNWA, Tampa Water, etc. | 
|
60 | Research other regional agencies (regional issues, regulations, how prioritized) | 
|
61 | Research into other organizations needs to include entities that purchase water rights (perhaps as a broker) that are then held by individual water providers. | 
|
62 | Costs for water shared in other arid areas. | 
|
63 | If available, identify sharing mechanisms considered for other states or districts that were rejected. | 
|
64 | If available, identify sharing mechanisms implemented for other states or districts that received much negative feedback afterward. | 
|
65 | If available, identify payment methods considered for other states or districts that were rejected. | 
|
66 | If available, identify payment methods implemented for other states or districts that received much negative feedback afterward. | 
|
67 | Costs of upgrading CAP delivery system | 
|
68 | Canal's (existing and expanded) limitations regarding peak deliveries | 
|
69 | Monthly delivery expectations from (NEW USERS) stakeholders | 
|
70 | How often is the existing excess canal capacity (over 1.5MAF) anticipated to be used to move Project water? | 
|
71 | CAP 2006 Strategic Plan Excerpts | 
|
72 | Strategic Plan Data | 
|
73 | Forbearance requirements if the supply source is Colorado River water | 
|
74 | Who has priority if there is a shortage? | 
|
75 | Volume of renewable water needed to replace existing groundwater by water provider. | 
|
76 | Volume of renewable water need to meet future demands by water provider. | 
|
77 | Volume of renewable water needed to back-up existing supplies by water provider. | 
|
78 | Volume of renewable water needed to back-up water supplies for future demands by water provider. | 
|
79 | A determination of types of water included or excluded in the ADD water process (e.g. effluent, project water, non-project water delivered thru the CAP canal, brackish groundwater, etc.) | 
|
80 | How much water is needed? | 
|
81 | When is "wet water" needed relates to source and capacity | 
|
82 | Timing of need--location of need | 
|
83 | What are the estimated demands for "new" water over the next 30 to 100 years? | 
|
84 | When will cities need additional water? | 
|
85 | What is timeline for needs? | 
|
86 | What are the types of entities needing water (municipal providers, private water companies, industrial, etc.)? | 
|
87 | What is reason for need (residential/industrial/agricultural)? | 
|
88 | Analysis of points of use demand based on current infrastructure | 
|
89 | Anticipated impacts to resources of Project from pending Indian water rights settlements | 
|